Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's score of 77. Google Pixel 2's construction is a little thicker but somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Google Pixel 2 has a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.