Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Galaxy A15 5G, getting an 81.6 score against 77.4. The Google Pixel 2 is an way older cellphone than Galaxy A15 5G, but Google was able to make it incredibly lighter and just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger display.
Google Pixel 2 features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G features a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A15 5G has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera with lot more MP.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.