Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's 76.2 general score. Google Pixel 2's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, but it's extremely lighter. Galaxy A16 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Google Pixel 2 has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A16 5G features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2700mAh. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a way lower resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.