Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Galaxy A20s, getting an 81.6 score against 77. The Google Pixel 2 is a a lot lighter cellphone than Galaxy A20s, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 2 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way greater pixels density.
Galaxy A20s has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 2 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.