Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G, having a general score of 81.6 against 79.9. The Google Pixel 2 body is notably lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released 6 years before. Google Pixel 2 has a lot better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little inferior pixel amount per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.