Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Galaxy A35 5G, getting an 81.6 score against 79.4. Google Pixel 2 is an extremely older device than Galaxy A35 5G, but Google was able to make it way lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a screen that is just as good as Google Pixel 2's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Galaxy A35 5G has as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Google Pixel 2, both have the same internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 2 features a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A35 5G features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent greater battery size. Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.