Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 score. The Galaxy A52 is a much newer phone than the Google Pixel 2, but it's much heavier and a little thicker. The Google Pixel 2 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a CPU that's very similar to the processor in Google Pixel 2, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.