Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Google Pixel 2, with a 91.3 score against 81.6. Galaxy A52 5G's design is a lot newer than Google Pixel 2's, although it's a little thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 2 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit better display density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's processing unit is very similar to the Google Pixel 2 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.