Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Google Pixel 2, having a 92.9 score against 81.6. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a lot newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 2, although it's incredibly heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.