Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Galaxy C7 Pro, getting a global score of 81.6 against 78.4. Even though the Google Pixel 2 and Galaxy C7 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Google Pixel 2 design is just a bit thicker but also lighter than Galaxy C7 Pro. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a little higher pixel density.
Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 2 has a little faster processor than Galaxy C7 Pro. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
Galaxy C7 Pro counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.