Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2, having a score of 88.1 against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy F62's design is much newer, but thicker and incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 2. Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a really larger screen.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the Google Pixel 2 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a much bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy F62 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.