Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 global score. The Galaxy Fold body is newer and somewhat thinner than Google Pixel 2's, although it is also notably heavier. The Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better screen pixels density.
Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
The Galaxy Fold has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.