Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 score. Google Pixel 2's body is thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy M20, although it was released about 16 months before. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M20. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a worse 12.2 MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.