Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Galaxy Note7, with an 81.6 score against 79.5. The Google Pixel 2 is a lighter phone than the Galaxy Note7, but both of them have the same thickness. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 2 also has more cpu cores.
Galaxy Note7 counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Google Pixel 2 captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a camera with a better resolution.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Galaxy Note7 features superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.