Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Google Pixel 2, getting a 93.6 score against 81.6. The Galaxy S10 5G is a notably heavier device than the Google Pixel 2, but they are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a really larger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Galaxy S10 5G features a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera in the back with less megapixels, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video.
Although Galaxy S10 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S10 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.