Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a 95.4 score against 81.6. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer, but thicker and way heavier than Google Pixel 2. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a way better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a just a bit greater screen density and a really bigger display. Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel 2's one, both have equal internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.