Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, with a general score of 82.6 against 81.6. Galaxy S25 is a a lot lighter and a lot thinner phone than the Google Pixel 2. The Galaxy S25 features a much better screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger screen.
Google Pixel 2 has a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a much higher video definition, a much more MP camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy S25 counts with as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as Google Pixel 2, both have equal internal storage. The Galaxy S25 features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 2, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.