Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than the Google Pixel 2's overall score of 81.6. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is extremely lighter and a lot thinner than Google Pixel 2. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a little greater pixel density, a really bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, because it has a lot higher video definition, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.