Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 4.64 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S4's global score of 76.1. The Google Pixel 2 is a just a little heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy S4, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S4 has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 2. They have a screen of the same size, the same display pixels density and exactly the same 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 has a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 2 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S4, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos, a way better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture. The Google Pixel 2 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.