Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-12 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 score. Although Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover 5. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy XCover 5 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.