Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2, having an 88.5 score against 81.6. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is way heavier than Google Pixel 2, it's a little bit thinner and also incredibly newer. Galaxy Z Flip features a display that is very similar to Google Pixel 2's screen, because although the Galaxy Z Flip has a little inferior quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a way larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a camera with less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, and they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 2, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.