Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Google Pixel 2's general score of 81.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is heavier than the Google Pixel 2, it's a little bit thinner and newer. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a display that is very similar to Google Pixel 2's screen, because although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lesser megapixels back facing camera, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.