Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a general score of 91.1 against 81.6. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition design is a lot thinner but incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 2. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a really larger display and a way better 1968 x 2184 resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a way better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 63% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 2, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.