Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, with an 81.6 score against 76.1. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 is way older than TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's body is thinner and incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater display pixel density.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a lot bigger sensor and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.