Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a general score of 83.8 against 81.6. Even being the best we are comparing, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s body is incredibly heavier and a bit thicker than Google Pixel 2. Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity per screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 2 and Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s count with extremely similar cameras, because although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a worse (4K) video definition and a lesser mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, it also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 2, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.