Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-05-09 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, having a general score of 81.6 against 79.5. The Google Pixel 2 design is just a little thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, even though it was released 6 years before. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little bit greater display pixels density, a really bigger display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a really superior performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro and Google Pixel 2 count with similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a way better resolution back-facing camera, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.