Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, getting an 81.6 score against 78.2. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than Xiaomi Poco M3, it's body is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco M3. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.