Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-05-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's overall score of 80.8. Google Pixel 2's body is lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display density. The Google Pixel 2 has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.