Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's score of 81.6. Although the Google Pixel 2 is way older than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, it's body is thinner and way lighter. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5160mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.