Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a overall score of 81.6 against 78.2. Google Pixel 2's design is thinner and extremely lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although it was released 3 years before. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher screen density.
Google Pixel 2 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 122% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.