Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a global score of 81.6 against 78.2. Even though the Google Pixel 2 is a lot older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's design is a bit thinner and incredibly lighter. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen.
Google Pixel 2 features much more memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% more battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera with much less mega pixels, they both have the same aperture.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.