Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting an 81.6 score against 81.1. The Google Pixel 2 body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 2 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.