Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, with an 84.9 score against 80.7. The iPhone 11 Pro is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 3 XL, although it is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. IPhone 11 Pro counts with a quite better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a little smaller screen, a way lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a just a little lower pixel density. Apple iPhone 11 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, they both have a same size sensor and the same aperture.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the Google Pixel 3 XL, both of them have equal internal storage. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.