Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than LG V20's general score of 77. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is much newer, but a little heavier and just a little thicker than the LG V20. Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better performance than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit better display than LG V20, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 2960px resolution, a little bit larger display and a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. LG V20 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity. The LG V20 counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the LG V20 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG V20, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.