Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with a overall score of 83.7 against 80.7. Although the LG V50 ThinQ and the Google Pixel 3 XL were released only 7 months apart, the LG V50 ThinQ design is just a little thicker but also just a little lighter than the Google Pixel 3 XL. LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a little better screen density, a bit larger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, a lesser mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG V50 ThinQ, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.