Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 score. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixel number per inch in the screen. The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back camera with a much higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3430mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL costs a bit more than Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.