Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a extremely newer and extremely thinner cellphone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's just a bit heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels count per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 3 XL and Motorola DROID Turbo both count with similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, they have equal internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has lesser processing cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Although Google Pixel 3 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.