Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a score of 81.2 against 80.7. The Motorola Edge 50 design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it is a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch and a little worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.