Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Google Pixel 3 XL is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but Google made it somewhat thinner and a little lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a little sharper screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G Stylus counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Moto G Stylus also has a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a much larger back camera sensor.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.