Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Moto Z4's general score of 79.8. Although it's the best device in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 XL is a heavier and a little thicker device than the Moto Z4. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better processor than Moto Z4. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better display than Moto Z4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z4 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto Z4 has a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Moto Z4 counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.