Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 522 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having an 84.7 score against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is way newer than Google Pixel 3 XL's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way better pixel count per screen inch. The Galaxy A32 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot more megapixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.