Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a overall score of 84.9 against 80.7. Galaxy A80's design is somewhat thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 3 XL. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.