Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3 XL's general score of 80.7. The Galaxy A90 5G design is newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL's, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A90 5G features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3430mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.