Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 522 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's extremely thicker and was released many years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a just a little worse pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better video resolution and a camera with lot more MP.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 66 percent larger battery size.
Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.