Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 194.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 522 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 5s's 76.4 overall score. Although Google Pixel 3 XL is extremely heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's just a little thinner and incredibly newer. Google Pixel 3 XL has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi 5s features a display that is very similar to Google Pixel 3 XL's display, although the Xiaomi Mi 5s has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, a little smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 XL also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.