Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with a global score of 84.9 against 80. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a newer phone than Google Pixel 3, although it's noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 11 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a just a little greater pixels number per screen inch and a little bigger display. IPhone 11 Pro and Google Pixel 3 both have very similar storage capacity to install games and applications, both have the same 64 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3046mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a worse resolution camera and a lower (4K) video definition, they both have the same sensor size and the same aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.