Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3, having a score of 80.3 against 80. Google Nexus 6P's body is a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 3, although it is somewhat heavier and was released 3 years before. The Google Nexus 6P features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a little bigger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit superior processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM. Google Nexus 6P takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a more MP back camera.
The Google Nexus 6P has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Google Nexus 6P has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.