Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than LG V20's score of 77. The Google Pixel 3 is a much newer and lighter phone than the LG V20, although it's also a bit thicker. The LG V20 features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little bigger display, a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit better count of pixels in each screen inch.
The LG V20 features a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V20 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger number of faster cores.
LG V20 takes a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the LG V20 also counts with a much higher 16 MP resolution camera in the back.
LG V20 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 3 is a better device, it is more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel 3, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.