Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, with an 83.7 score against 80. The LG V50 ThinQ is a just a bit thicker and heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3. LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a larger screen and a just a little greater pixel density.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2915mAh. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, a back camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light environments.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.