Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 3 design is notably newer, lighter and way thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo has a better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little better performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Droid Turbo has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Droid Turbo, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.